<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A follow up to my Easy ARIA tip #2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marcozehe.de/2008/03/25/a-follow-up-to-my-easy-aria-tip-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marcozehe.de/2008/03/25/a-follow-up-to-my-easy-aria-tip-2/</link>
	<description>Musings, tips and tricks about the accessible software world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 22:41:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: pvagner</title>
		<link>http://www.marcozehe.de/2008/03/25/a-follow-up-to-my-easy-aria-tip-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1376</link>
		<dc:creator>pvagner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 08:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marcozehe.de/2008/03/25/a-follow-up-to-my-easy-aria-tip-2/#comment-1376</guid>
		<description>I am getting too excited about WAI-ARIA and all the nice tricks it allows a web developer to do. So I decided to try this trick with latest release candidate of firefox as well as with the internet explorer 7.
Using either ARIA markup or plain HTML 4 Internet explorer does not clip all the label parts into one so if the construction without the actual number from the input box is rather senseless it is really good idea to use an ARIA markup because anyway if internet explorer does not seem to support either of these method with the ARIA based approach the label can be overidden for legacy browsers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am getting too excited about WAI-ARIA and all the nice tricks it allows a web developer to do. So I decided to try this trick with latest release candidate of firefox as well as with the internet explorer 7.<br />
Using either ARIA markup or plain HTML 4 Internet explorer does not clip all the label parts into one so if the construction without the actual number from the input box is rather senseless it is really good idea to use an ARIA markup because anyway if internet explorer does not seem to support either of these method with the ARIA based approach the label can be overidden for legacy browsers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Craig</title>
		<link>http://www.marcozehe.de/2008/03/25/a-follow-up-to-my-easy-aria-tip-2/comment-page-1/#comment-503</link>
		<dc:creator>James Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 18:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marcozehe.de/2008/03/25/a-follow-up-to-my-easy-aria-tip-2/#comment-503</guid>
		<description>The embedded example may not have worked in Internet Explorer because it requires use of the for/id attributes, even if the association is implied by nesting the the input element inside the label element. Therefore, if you nested the input in the label, and still included the for/id, it should work in both of your browsers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The embedded example may not have worked in Internet Explorer because it requires use of the for/id attributes, even if the association is implied by nesting the the input element inside the label element. Therefore, if you nested the input in the label, and still included the for/id, it should work in both of your browsers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
